• oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    The article says that with full starvation it doesn’t change much because some vital organs will not be able to use your fat, but rather the proteins from your muscles, including your heart, until it fails. But if you somehow have partial starvation with some protein intake, then you may outlive a skinnier person.
    My initial shower thought was if someone very muscular would outlive someone less muscular, I found this article and not one precisely on my thought. But I guess it does imply that. I am still wondering if having more muscles could also make you starve faster because your basic metabolism would require more energy?

    • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This whole discussion makes me hungry tbh. I guess the real answer is to always have loads of food in the cupboard (just in case). Lucky - due to watching too many zombie apocalypse movies, combined with living in a not entirely stable country - I do.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The problem is that your body doesn’t selectively consume muscle. If your body is starving, it will break down your heart and your biceps regardless of how big either is.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Wouldn’t a bigger influx of energy from non-essential muscles somehow reduce the speed at which essential muscles are consumed?