• MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    If it’s critical for operation of a device the company makes it’s money with.

    Edit: free, but i meant open

  • arthur@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    A way to address that is to require that if the company does not provide software updates, it must release the source code and tooling to it’s customers under cc-0 license. For games that depends on server-side services to work, that should be provided as well.

    But under capitalism, that will be an uphill battle.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I remember that RMS’s position is that if someone (!) can change it (eg there is an “update firmware” button), it is a computer and should run free software. If no one can ever change it, it is a circuit. I think that makes some sense.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Many microcontrollers can be set up for in circuit programming.

      They might be intended for one time programming in the factory, but solder some wires on in the right place and supply the right signal and it can be reprogrammed.

      Is that a circuit or a computer?

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    One is to view free firmware as desirable but not necessary

    I can’t make firmware but I hope the people who can make free (libre) firmware don’t give up, which is what that position sounds like.