So, what gun control would have stopped the Kansas City shooting? - Washington Examiner
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Now that we have more information about the Kansas City parade shooting, we can see that all of the activists yelling for gun control are out of their depth.
  • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
    0·
    10 months ago

    The whole “what could have stopped X” question is a loaded one. But regardless, the answer is gun control, and U.S. law should learn from modern German law:

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/germany-gun-control-laws-a4366996.html

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/london-evening-standard/

    It’s crazy how even this right wing sources seems to understand that gun control is necessary and a requirement for low gun death rates, given that they admit right at the begging of the article that they have amongst the lowest death rates out there.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

    Total:

    Germany: 1.04/capita

    United States: 12.21/capita

    Homicide only:

    Germany: 0.06/capita

    United States: 4.46/capita

    If more guns & lax gun laws made us safe, we would should expect to see the opposite. Yet we don’t, because anybody with half a brain understands that a tool whose purpose is to kill as easily as possible will make killing easier when it is around untrained people/people with insufficient reason to own it/people who store them poorly.

    That’s a 75x smaller gun homicide rate. We aren’t going to get that small of a rate without gun control.

    Inb4 somebody calls me a troll despite putting effort into this: fuck off

    • ConMod@lemm.eeM
      0·
      10 months ago

      Mate, here’s a great example of you intentionally pissing everyone off. Look at how much effort you put into the comment, you got sources and everything. But you’re still managed to piss everyone off, while maintaining a thin facade of civility. We can see past it at this point, you aren’t here to discuss or anything, just to troll.

      A try-hard troll is still a troll.

      I’m still going to let peepin make the final decision, but I fully recommend a ban.

      • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
        0·
        10 months ago

        Mate, here’s a great example of you intentionally pissing everyone off.

        … by simply existing evidently.

        But you’re still managed to piss everyone off, while maintaining a thin facade of civility.

        If bringing up straight facts is enough to piss people off, then you guys are the problem, not me or the facts.

        you aren’t here to discuss or anything

        Then why the fuck would I be putting in the tiniest bit of effort? Trolls don’t put effort in.

        • ConMod@lemm.eeM
          0·
          10 months ago

          You made a false assumption, and went all in on sources that depend on that assumption.

          • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
            0·
            10 months ago

            1. What are you even talking about?

            2. Are you going to address what I said?

            • ConMod@lemm.eeM
              01·
              10 months ago

              You know what, no, I’m not. I’m going to turn off my computer, and go drink a couple more beers and do literally anything but get on lemmy tonight.