Here you go, a “real” source. He said there were more bullet ballots than there likely really are, but there’s still a really suspiciously high number of them. How is this not at least worth investigating?

  • EndlessApollo@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’d say the number of bullet ballots is evidence that something is almost certainly up that needs investigating. That’s not a normal occurrence

    • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Things can be anomalous and abnormal and not be nefarious. Abnormality isn’t evidence of criminality. So, why investigate? Because the number of bullet ballots is slightly higher? A more reasonable explanation is that some people cared more about president than other down ballot elections.

      • EndlessApollo@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Why do you assume it’s not nefarious? This is literally Trump and the GOP we’re talking about, did him trying to bribe governors for votes make you trust him more or something?