• jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, it isn’t.

      https://copyright.psu.edu/copyright-basics/fair-use/

      "In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—

      the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

      the nature of the copyrighted work;

      the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

      the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work."

      So, me, making a fan page for FunkoPop versions of the Five Nights at Freddies characters and using their images? THAT’S fair use.

      Me charging money for a fan game based on the same Funko versions of those characters is NOT fair use.

      “Section 107 of the Copyright Act gives examples of purposes that are favored by fair use: “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, [and] research.””

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Fortunately our laws aren’t about what’s moral or not. You need religious police for that.

          The correct process would have been to issue a takedown request, then go after the domain if nothing was done, they just jumped the gun.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            what i mean by moral, is about things being fair or not, and this is clearly not.

            see, the fact that they can jump the gun, but the end users cant is the problem here. even the correct process is very biased towards big companies because they can afford a lawyer army to harass people with weaponized bureaucracy.

            who cares besides them anyway? they cant sue everyone.