• _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, however, using a public SearXNG instance makes your searches effectively private, since it’s the server doing them, not you. It also does not use generative AI to produce the results, and won’t until or unless the ability for normal searches is removed.

        And at that point, you can just disable that engine for searching.

        • leanleft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          from a privacy perspective…
          you might as well use a vpn or tor. same thing.

          • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes, but that’s not the only benefit to it. It’s a metasearch engine, meaning it searches all the individual sites you ask for, and combines the results into one page. This makes it more akin to DDG, but it doesn’t just use one search provider.

            • leanleft@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              it’s a fantastic metasearch engine. but also people frequently dont configure it to its max potential IMO . one common mishap is the frequent default setting of sending queries to google. 💩

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Internet was a great resource for sharing and pooling human knowledge.

    Now generative AI has come along to dilute knowledge in a great sea of excrement. Humans have to hunt through the shit to find knowledge.

    • GaiusBaltar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      To be fair, humans were already diluting it in a great sea of excrement, the robots just came to take our job and do it even faster and better.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Ok.

    > uses search engine

    > search engine gives generative AI answer

    God dammit

    > scroll down

    > click search result

    > AI Generated article

    • Oka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I ask GPT for random junk all the time. If it’s important, I’ll double-check the results. I take any response with a grain of salt, though.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        You are spending more time and effort doing that than you would googling old fashioned way. And if you don’t check, you might as well throwing magic 8-ball, less damage to the environment, same accuracy

        • bradd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          When it’s important you can have an LLM query a search engine and read/summarize the top n results. It’s actually pretty good, it’ll give direct quotes, citations, etc.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            And some of those citations and quotes will be completely false and randomly generated, but they will sound very believable, so you don’t know truth from random fiction until you check every single one of them. At which point you should ask yourself why did you add unneccessary step of burning small portion of the rainforest to ask random word generator for stuff, when you could not do that and look for sources directly, saving that much time and energy

            • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I, too, get the feeling, that the RoI is not there with LLM. Being able to include “site:” or “ext:” are more efficient.

              I just made another test: Kaba, just googling kaba gets you a german wiki article, explaining it means KAkao + BAnana

              chatgpt: It is the combination of the first syllables of KAkao and BEutel - Beutel is bag in german.

              It just made up the important part. On top of chatgpt says Kaba is a famous product in many countries, I am sure it is not.