Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoPro-tip for this capitalistic hellscapeslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down15
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkPro-tip for this capitalistic hellscapeslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squarejrs100000@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 days agoYou could just raise chickens at the point.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-25 days agoCrickets are cheaper/more efficient.
minus-squareCorkyskog@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoBut you can do both, if your cricket operation really gets going you can use them to feed the chickens.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·5 days agoFeeding destruents to a destruent? Two times the loss; crickets/chicken was supposed to save food money, not waste it.
You could just raise chickens at the point.
Crickets are cheaper/more efficient.
But you can do both, if your cricket operation really gets going you can use them to feed the chickens.
Feeding destruents to a destruent? Two times the loss; crickets/chicken was supposed to save food money, not waste it.