• witten@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s like the old saying, “If you see a child stealing food, no you didn’t.”

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Nah.

        Rich people steal for “fun” sometimes.

        And something like baby formula is often stolen to be sold overseas, not because they needed it.

        • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Maybe so. But if there’s any possibility it’s a genuine need, don’t ruin a baby’s chance to get fed.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Uhhh?

            These people stripped shelves empty, causing many babies to go hungry because nothing was in stock.

              • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s designed to trigger someone’s ingrained beliefs, the others are stealing not “the corporations with incentive to restrict supply to increase profits are taking advantage of people’s beliefs”

            • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Unless you’re that store’s manager, you should be more upset that people who are hungry aren’t being fed to the point they resort to theft.

              Actually, you should be more upset by that either way. I understand not wanting to support theft of food just to eat but something is wrong when you condemn it.

                • shneancy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  you cannot know which one is which when you see a person shoplifting

                  if you snitch on them, there are two outcomes:

                  • whoever organised the crime of stealing baby formula doesn’t get their daily quota from the person they told to do it, and either helps or punishes the person desperate enough to go and do the actual shoplifting for them. You helped a corporation avoid theft

                  • a baby goes without food, and an already impoverished parent is financially, legally, or socially punished. You helped a corporation avoid theft

                  is it worth it to possibly make a mother cry as her baby goes hungry, to try to help a corporation?

            • groet@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              The question is about which is worse: do you what kids to suffer to make sure nobody can enrich themselves. Or do you allow some scumbags through the net but no child goes hungry?

              Ideally of course you could have both but that would first require a few guillotined politicians and capitalists.