• MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Republicans are going to start being in favor of gun control laws if the gun violence pendulum starts swinging in that direction. Not sure if that would be a win or not.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Gun control is fundamentally a right wing policy. Just because it aligned with *some people’s preferred right wing party on a culture war wedge issue doesn’t make it right.

      Like look at California; the only reason their gun laws are so strict is because they were scared of the Black Panthers doing open carry observation of police. It was a targeted, racist attack on a political movement that was completely bipartisan, because the political class has solidarity with one another against the rest of us.

      Like what do *liberals think about abortion bans? Do they reduce the number of abortions? What about drug & alcohol bans? Do they work? We know these things don’t actually stop anyone from doing anything, they just make those behaviours more dangerous.

      So why do *they think gun bans will actually be effective? Do *they think the cops will actually use it to protect children? They had all the power at Uvalde and they used it to keep parents from saving their kids.

      The US is an unprecedentedly violent police state with the largest military, the largest criminal population in history and a fetishistic obsession with guns, of course their children turn to guns to take out their rage. That’s what they see modelled all around them.

      Edit: removed the words that assume this is the position of the person I’m replying to. I still stand by the points.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Do you think bans reduced the amount of drinking & driving, or was it education?

          Like you can’t just name another thing that you’re confident I disagree with and assume I’m going to suddenly support the ban.

          You’re doing the thing ban advocates always do: “thing bad”. Okay, thing bad. So how do we actually, effectively, reduce it? Because bans don’t work.