It’s a rare example of English being simpler than other languages, so I’m curious if it’s hard for a new speaker to keep the nouns straight without the extra clues.

  • frankenswine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    not at all. it simplifies the learning experience by quite a bunch.

    one of the more confusing is learning other gendered languages where the gender of some object is different to the one in your mother tongue

    • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      To make matters worse, some languages have the exact same word but with a different gender. Heat in Spanish is el calor but in Catalán is la calor

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        To make matters even worse, in some languages the exact same word with different gender has different meaning.

        In German:
        “der Band”, male, = a (book) volume
        “das Band”, neutral, = ribbon
        “die Band”, female = (music) band

        Bonus: “die Bande” can be a gang, a sports barrier, and (relationship) ties.

  • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Non-gendered wording isn’t exclusive to English, it’s mostly other European languages that stick to doing that.

    There are some languages that don’t even have different words for “he” and “she”.

    Edit: made the wording less asshole-y

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Non-gendered wording isn’t exclusive to English. Asia exists.

      I wasn’t trying to imply otherwise.

      Thanks for the insight!

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Chinese is even cooler in that they don’t need different, often irregular versions of the same word for tense and plural either.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            They lose out in that any time you refer to something that can be counted, you have an irregular counting word before it. Each word doesn’t get its own counting word though, and there’s a generic, ge you can always use if you have the vocabulary of a 3 year old, so it’s not that bad, but it’s still completely unnecessary memorization.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Here I agree, it’s an unnecessary pain, and the counting words are often super counter-intuitive