“ma’am, the penis’s owner, you, literally told me to put a condom on it. Not sure how much more consent I could have.”
Being asked to do a task by the person responsible for administering the task automatically obviates you from being classified as a rapist.
“We were only following orders.”
What? If another person asks me to to rape a person then does that absolve me from being a rapist? Am i misunderstanding you?
Yes.
They are penis models, not human beings.
It is context specific.
If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.
The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.
Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.
The post does point out that there’s a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.
A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.
In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.
So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?
Context: they arent human. So, no. Of course it isn’t. Stop baiting.
Why is everyone getting angry at this woman who most likely doesn’t even exist
It’s fun and risk free
It happens to every greentext post on lemmy, gotta bring em back down to reality and let them know it’s fake and gay.
Greentexts are improv comedy and everyone is polite enough to play along instead of trying to argue what is clearly a made-up story for laughs
People love hating people. Simple as
Fake: anon speaks to a woman
Gay: anon investigates model penises
Case closed, we can wrap this one up boys.
