Summary

Retail returns in 2024 are projected to reach $890 billion, up from $743 billion in 2023, driven by practices like “bracketing” (ordering multiple sizes/colors) and “wardrobing” (buying for one-time use).

Rising return rates burden retailers, costing up to 30% of an item’s price to process, while contributing to landfill waste and carbon emissions.

To address the issue, 81% of retailers tightened return policies in 2023, with some implementing fees or offering “keep it” refunds.

Sustainable resale programs and customer-friendly policies are emerging as strategies to balance costs and consumer expectations.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe if they didn’t sell garbage that advertises itself with false promises the return rate would be lower.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    Loss of profits sounds like a you problem. Don’t really care about that.

    As for the environmental impact of returns, good point. I’m happy with the “keep it and have your money back” system. Imo it should be mandatory if the retailer is online-only, but that’s a stretch. Maybe the US should focus on basic consumer rights first. But that sounds like a bulletpoint for in 4 years time, if it’s still applicable then.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      how does someone keeping something broken or they don’t want to use good for the environment. thats like guaranteed landfill. they should take it back and dispose of it properly.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        For broken things it would be best to have them thrown away locally than shipped back again, then bundled and shipped as a mystery pallet.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean it should really move up the chain and their should be a requirement for maximum recycling. A total cost type thing that might result in longer lasting products.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      In four years time our window for action on the environment will be barely cracked open. It will be too late.

  • elgordino@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    One thing I found odd when living in the USA was how much folks treated a shop like a library. For a small example I needed a tape measure for a job, my boss suggested buying it, using it, and then returning it. Always thought that was weird, I’d only ever return something broken or that didn’t match the description.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Maybe of they stop selling garbage.
    And people stop buying said garbage.
    Just maybe these numbers would be lower.