I’m curious to know what’s gonna happen to the Luigi guy, the one accused of gunning down the CEO.

I’m not sure how I feel about vigilante justice. One one hand, I find it hard to rationalize how the CEO didn’t deserve what happened to him, on the other hand, there’s a system that should be followed. Isn’t that the social contract? You follow the rules, and I’ll follow the rules.

Then again, what if the rules are wack? You change them. What if you can’t? You act until they change. I guess that’s the reasonable train of thought there. When have you acted too much? Is there such a point?

I assume there’s a bunch of philosophers that’ve already thought up answers to these questions.

In my opinion, as I’ve formed it for now, the CEO had it coming. His murder is for the better. Yet, it shouldn’t have been done.

Are there times when doing the right thing is the wrong thing to do? That sounds like an oxymoron.