I’m done with the weak-waffle sounds of pro-choice.

I’m Pro-Abortion. I wouldn’t force anyone to have an abortion, but if you want one I’ll drive.

  • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Reproductive rights don’t need rebranding. Whenever it is directly and independently put to the voters, it has absolutely astounding success.

    The main issues are that politicians do not represent the people, and they are a package deal.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    No. I’m sorry. This is about choice. It has always been about choice and it will always be about choice and we should not avoid that fact.

    No one should be forced to have their body used for someone else’s benefit unless they choose to. It’s that simple. We even make that true about corpses. You have the choice of whether or not your body parts are used for the benefit of others after you die.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s called pro-choice because the true underlying thing trying to be denied by “pro-life” is women’s right to choose what they do with their own body. We need to keep the term “pro-choice” but change “pro-life” to “anti-woman.”

  • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pro-abortion would imply that by banning abortions, you are not banning woman being able to make their own choices in life, which is one of the main arguments for it in the first place.