Burgers come from Hamburg, Germany, hot dogs come from Frankfurt, Germany, macaroni and cheese come from Rome, Italy.

I’m pretty sure it’s like this for every cousine.

The bottom line is that restaurants have to have a theme, right, how else would anyone even talk about it? And the theme is usually some region of the world with varying specificity, my favorite is “fusion,” where the restaurant has two, or even three themes. When you go to a place with any theme, it’s always a charicature. In the case of restaurants, I’ve found that the food rarely represents the daily cuisine of the regular people of whatever place or tradition, it’s rather the cuisine of a restauranteur trying to run a business.

It’s a few choice special dinner dishes, like Sunday or holiday meals, and a few chubby-kid approved favorites, and it seems just as often it’s stereoptyical dishes that may not even be from the place/culture, such as General Tso’s Chicken, that came from one Hunanese resteraunt in New York in 1972, and is now in the menu if every Chinese restaurant in America. And American restaurants abroad serve franks and hamburgers, despite the origins of both being in Frankfurt and Hamburg, Germany. In sum, there are no rules and everything is made up. You can get New Haven style pizza in Rome.

Why couldn’t they just drink the bleach?

Is this some weird anti abortion grooming or something?

Lol. I had no idea.

What if there were a far-right populist movement advocating online for murdering specific leftists and encouraging anyone who might act on it to do so, by also promising to nullify valid criminal charges for such murders and encouraging others to do the same?

You don’t see how in some places that might fall under accomplice liability? Encouragement plus shared intent equals accomplice. Don’t even need to take a step toward the criminal purpose, as with conspirator liability. Surprised you didn’t know that. Seems like you have room temp IQ.

Makes sense to me.

Nah I can disagree and still like you. You’re smart and kind, I can tell.

A lot were hung from the neck to their death, many (maybe most?) victims of lynchings were only “strung up” for display after they were already slowly tortured to death, such as cutting off the victims’ fingers and ears, genitals, stabbing them with corkscrews to pull out twitching entrails and chunks of muscle, beaten nearly to death, and thrown on a fire, still writhing, or all of the above, such Luther Holbert in 1904. I don’t think I’ve seen photos of one lynching were the bodies weren’t bloodied and battered, if not utterly mutilated.

The association of nooses, of gallows executions, with lynching understates the inhumanity and depravity of it. The public display of such senseless brutality, based solely on race, was the point: it was to keep everyone, white and black, in line, as you put it. White kids took home fingers and teeth as souvenirs; it seems to me that it usually had nothing to do with whatever pretext. The pretexts used to justify the lynchings, such as one US Army private who refused to empty his pockets before shopping, or one free man who addressed a sheriff by the name on his shirt without saying Mister first, are things that were not crimes.

The reasons didn’t actually matter to the perpetrators, victims didn’t actually have to commit a crime to be singled and murdered. Even when there was a criminal charge, it was usually bogus and the trial was always a sham. I’m not trying to pick on you Maggoty but I like you so I want you to appreciate what you’re saying.

https://eji.org/wp-content/uploads/2005/11/lynching-in-america-3d-ed-110121.pdf

Just on the their license plates. Doesn’t mean anything.

They were taken on different days.

They have over 200 photos already. I think the smiling photos are on a different day.

Nah we keep Alaska too.

He was widely hated* then.

This isn’t about justice this is about national security, about who has custody of the former president’s son.

This is to avoid a kidnapping and ransom.

Yes. There’s nobody who knows anything about anything who doesn’t know America is the world’s only super power.

Some people who don’t know what they’re talking about say China, and that may be true someday but not today.

Yes. There’s nobody who knows anything about anything who doesn’t know America is the world’s only super power.

Some people who don’t know what they’re talking about say China and that may be true someday but not today.

Nobody in America thinks this fyi. We know exactly why the world cares and it’s because we are the world’s only super power.

Men and men aren’t physically equal. Maybe basketball should have a rule that everyone in the team has to be the same height. Can’t have anyone with a physical advantage over anyone else.

Every study states it itself. There’s always a category for “unknown,” and if for some reason there isn’t such a category, you know the source you are reading is some full of shit organization that at best is misleading people just to collect money and at worst is only talking about dogs so they can push pseudo genetic science including eugenics and blood lible.

Your narrative from Wikipedia is some hysterical author focusing on one group of dogs. It’s also undeniable that training is an exponentially more significant factor in animal behavior than genetics, so let’s assume they were bred for fighting other dogs at a dog fight, so what? What does that have to do with dogs biting humans in their own homes or at the park? It’s a stupid argument you’re making.