Indeed, that’s why I use the AGPL license. Corporations hate it because it forces them to give back.

That’s actually pretty reasonable. I’d be happy to make my open source projects compliant for a company - but they can damn well pay me for the effort.

Thanks! This is just one of the six but it looks absolutely fine. Obvs not ideal that it’s greenfield site but it’s next to the existing sub station which is logical, and there’s some provision for green screen from the road. And 500MW storage is pretty damn impressive.

More likely that they know of all the data they gather this is the most privacy defying, and impossible to anonymise so they’re fixing it before the EU forces them to.

Why do so many projects ignore semantic versioning? It’s so much easier to comprehend changes when versions are major, minor or patch

Is there a link to the actual proposal? The community published map does look rather strange but I imagine there’s some logic behind it in the official proposal

You’re a very strange person.

No, neither of us need to do anything.

Dude, you’re the one asserting that healthcare costs will rise due to increased security requirements.

I don’t quite follow why the onus is on me to backup my retort.

please show me.

Nah, I’m good. Clearly our opinions differ. It’s of no interest to me to collate a bunch of sources just for you to dismiss in bad faith.

Feel free to find sources to support your own argument though if you like.

If they could squeeze out an extra dollar then they would already do so. They don’t need to justify it as “increased security costs”.

Isn’t it always said that jurys are made up of people not smart enough to get out of jury duty.

Is there a Lemmy community for /c/ShitAmericansSay

In order to get the perfect dystopia vibe they filmed entirely in Northumberland.

What a terribly written article. I got half way through and just gave up.

UK to be more precise. England doesn’t have a devolved parliament