I think they interviewed people in his circles, and I think a friend flippantly noticed it was kinda ironic that they played Among Us with someone who went on to actually assassinate sometime, and now the media is twisting that into the standard “video games cause violence” bugbear.

The United States had their own Brexit 250 years ago

Still, different angle of attack.

In space, you are the bracing surface.

I fear the transitional period implied by some of these changes will be what gets you. You have unlimited authority; you can’t just snap your fingers like a genie, you’ll need to implement these policies. These things take time, and they’ll cause chaos and uncertainty, followed by confusion as people adjust. If you’re not careful with your rollout, you risk waves of disapproval.

Fibonacci numbers are easier than ln(5) to calculate on the spot tho

False. Leg position is different, one allows additional bracing. NASA virgins caught red handed.

Just in case

Weak, sure. It’s also a public argument made by an official Libertarian Party politician. Most of the stronger ones come from more anonymous libertarians. If that’s what they’re saying in public, etc. etc.

Based on the group name, it might be a satirical take on the engagement bait trend? It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen this kind of lampooning of vapid social media fads.

Personally, I’ve always subconsciously associated the last name in a list of names as the one who does the real work. Like if Lewis was so great, why did he need to bring Clark on board? Again, subconsciously, I associate the first name with vanity, the face of the group taking credit for a joint effort. I know that it’s usually just a case of what has a better rhythm, but I feel the way I feel.

This doesn’t extend to longer lists, anyone in the middle feels like a handout, “Oh yeah, they were also involved I guess”. Again, totally based on feels, and I’m probably weird for this.

I always heard it as “Not my monkeys, not my circus”

Or do you honestly believe he did everything he could?

In general? Definitely not. In this specific case? Yeah, probably. It’s not normal for appointees to be sycophant drones, and in terms of concentration of power it’s not even desirable. Concentrating total power in the President is not a good idea, and advocating it by blaming the President for things that fall outside the scope of their power only empowers the people who want a dictator.

He made his appointments to the Board. The decisions those Board members make are on them, if you have a problem with their decisions, criticize them directly and direct your correspondence to them. Concentrating every complaint on the President promotes an inaccurate, and therefore ineffective, conception of scope of responsibility.

We can’t rule out two-eyed giants obviously

Running for reelection.

I’m not making excuses for him, I’m discouraging an inaccurate conception of the division of powers. I’m fine blaming him for all the things that are his fault, but I don’t think reinforcing the idea that “the president is a king who has total authoritarian control over the federal government” helps anyone except the people who want to make that a reality. He appointed what he could to the Board, direct your ire, in this instance, at them.

Agreed, but it’s out of Biden’s hands now, I don’t like popularizing a unitary executive

A sett of anatomical tables, with explanations, and an abridgment, of the practice of midwifery, William Smellie, (1754)

Table 32 Edit: NSFW I guess, 18th century medical illustrations of female reproductive anatomy

Doesn’t look like twins though

Biden isn’t a king. Postmaster General is elected by the Board of Governors, which Biden did replace a number of. Also no more than half of them can be from the same party, so gridlock is natural.

Are we sure it’s AI? It looks like an old medical illustration for delivering twins entangled in the womb.