That’s not single payer, that’s single provider (or, more correctly, single denier).

Not yet.

Trump lied? Wow, what kind of precedent is there for that?

More likely pay-per-view torture to death.

He can pardon him now. It’s only the crime (or even alleged crime) that needs to have happened before the pardon. Consider Ford’s pardon of Nixon, which occurred before Tricky Dick was indicted.

Listen to some soft jazz to calm down. I suggest Mangione.

That can change. And as an emergency measure, we should asset-strip every single one of them.

The first government pension system was implemented by that arch-conservative Bismarck.

Who they are is a matter of public record. Let justice be done.

Yeah, you’re right, better to let them curbstomp us while we wring our virtuous hands and think about the high road that’s breaking our teeth.

The DNC need to start doing something very simple.

The DNC need to start doing something.

You notice there are all these restrictive rules for those on the side of democracy, yet none for the fascists? I wonder why that is.

Democrats and fucking Bill Maher are not the resistance to anything. The only way to defeat Trump and his billionaire Nazi backers is by organized and escalating direct action. Look at Seoul, look at Tbilisi, that’s how you successfully oppose illegitimate, corrupt power.

The thing you’re leaving out is that they deliberately targeted his family. Correcting that miscarriage of justice is not abusing the office, unless you’re saying that Hunter has less rights than anyone else because of who his father is.

You’re too good for this world. Or at least you think you are.

Trump doesn’t care how anything looks. He loves to violate laws and civilized norms of behavior, he thinks it makes him look strong.

Trump accepting the pardon from himself means he’s guilty

Accepting a pardon does not require an admission of guilt. That’s a myth. There is no part of the pardon process where you are required to admit guilt

In fact, pardons have been issued because the pardoning authority determined that a person has been wrongly convicted. And at the federal level, general pardons have also been issued. In the case of a general pardon, if you accept one, what are you pleading guilty to? Every possible potential crime covered by the pardon?

Garland was dicta. It was also bullshit.

Authoritarians have only one reason: “Because I said so.”

because it basically refutes the idea of there being a body of law

So does money being the same as speech. So does presidential immunity.

There seems to be a pattern here.

Most corporations never wanted them in the first place.