misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoChinese companies are reportedly reluctant to adopt homegrown chips — domestic solutions are technologically too far behindwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10cross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkChinese companies are reportedly reluctant to adopt homegrown chips — domestic solutions are technologically too far behindwww.tomshardware.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
minus-squareatrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoThis is especially interesting in the wake of the Chinese Government’s new ban on AMD and Intel chips in government computers. https://lemmy.kde.social/comment/3150960
minus-squareKorkki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoWell the requirements for government IT stack is really more about security and reliability than performance.
minus-squareBlack History Month@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 days agoBan so they have justification for confiscation. It’s not a real ‘ban’. Like how russian missiles ‘aren’t’ made with western components but actually are.
This is especially interesting in the wake of the Chinese Government’s new ban on AMD and Intel chips in government computers.
https://lemmy.kde.social/comment/3150960
Well the requirements for government IT stack is really more about security and reliability than performance.
Ban so they have justification for confiscation. It’s not a real ‘ban’. Like how russian missiles ‘aren’t’ made with western components but actually are.