• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 14th, 2023

help-circle



  • GaMEChld@lemmy.worldtoAntiwork@lemmy.worldClass Warfare
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Dunno, that’s like saying every gun owner is a sandy hook shooter. There’s plenty of problems that need solving, you take them in order of prioritization. Equating them all is stupid. If I’ve got enough hammer and nails to fix one thing, I’m going to fix the biggest problem I can.

    To act without prioritization is akin to using your one hose to water the plants instead of put out your house fire.

    You solve enough high priority problems and you’ll be surprised how many smaller issues resolve themselves as a matter of course.





  • I understand what you’re saying. The answer is yes, we choose when violence is justified.

    Lemmy doesn’t do well with nuanced discussion. The communication dilemma present is the lack of the bridge between where one party in the discussion wants to continue narrowing the parameters of discussion until we are left with a binary choice (the quantum side of discussion) and the other party wants to keep the discussion broad and cognizant of all the variables (the general relativity side of discussion).

    Both sides have valid reasons for existing. Usually you do have to narrow parameters in order to actually come up with a solution or action to implement. Similarly to how in a valid experiment you attempt to control all variables except what you’re testing. But you also have to be aware of all the variables in the first place to adequately control them.