• rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They didn’t ban it because it was dangerous or violent, They banned it because the anti-corporate and spez is a musk wanna be

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        I appreciate how quick a read is it. Much more likely for random people to read it and start thinking and then you can jump out of the bushes and go “surprise, you just read a manifesto!

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yes it is. So what. The rich glorifies violence against the poor.

    The leader of the country once said: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts”

    So if its apparantly okay to use violence against alledged thieves (which is not okay btw, stealing should never equate a death sentence), then it must be okay to use violence against mass murderer CEOs.

    “When the denying starts, the deposing starts” would be my rebuttal to that phase the ex-president said. Violence begets violence.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 minute ago

      You get points for honesty, at least. Most people in here don’t even admit this is a call for violence.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Is anyone with a pulse still on reedit? All I ever see there are AIO/AITA/best of creative writing exercises that reek of ChatGPT

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        On the odd occasion I go to reddit front page, AITA is always at the top with an obviously AI generated ridiculous story.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Reddit was full of false outrage and fake stories long before GPT ever existed. Just the last few people that were willing to post have kind of wandered off. I think we got the best of them here

      • pycorax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        Some communities just don’t really have an equivalent elsewhere but I’m purely only lurking now. Don’t comment anymore, use a modded third party client on mobile and ublock origin on desktop.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m there for a couple of videogames and the homelab/selfhosted stuff. Curated subreddits are still active and real.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Depends on the context in which you’re sharing it.

    If you share it with a title like “We need more of this”, then yeah, because you’re encouraging further acts like it. If you share it with a title like “This is the manifesto written by the alleged CEO killer”, then that’s not inherently glorifying violence, you’re just sharing something you found and being informative. But if you share it in response to the question “Hey Reddit, what are some fun things I can do in NYC this weekend?”, then you’re back toward the “glorifying” side. Context makes all the difference.

    Whether or not anybody gives a shit about that distinction, though, is a different question.